ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A qualitative study of telemedicine in heart failure care.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experiences and support needs of patients receiving home mechanical ventilation and their caregivers: a qualitative meta-synthesis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Heart failure is a prevalent chronic condition with a poor prognosis that impairs quality of life and generates high healthcare use. Telemedicine is increasingly used in heart failure care, but patients' everyday experiences remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore and interpret the experiences and motivations of patients with heart failure participating in a telemedicine programme. Methods: We conducted a qualitative content analysis among patients with heart failure receiving home-based telemedicine. Semi-structured in-person interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guided conduct and reporting. Results: Data saturation was achieved after 21 interviews. Five main categories and 13 subcategories were identified: (1) benefits of telemedicine (perceived safety and reassurance, greater self-control, recommendation of telemedicine); (2) impact on daily life (time impact, practical limitations and mobility, conflicting experience); (3) relationship with healthcare professionals (presence of healthcare professionals, desire for greater contact, professional behaviors); (4) interaction with technology (unreliable devices, unreliable connectivity); and (5) family context (family support, family members' attitudes). Conclusion: Telemedicine for patients with heart failure can enhance perceived safety and reassurance, self-management, continuity of care and treatment adherence when supported by strong patient-clinician relationships, reliable technology and alignment with daily routines and family dynamics. Future programs should be co-designed with patients and caregivers, include flexible personalized monitoring, clearly explaining how data are used and ensure two-way communication. Multicenter mixed-methods studies are needed to refine person-centered telemedicine models that best support heart failure care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.