ArticleOncology research2026
Sunitinib and Fenofibrate as Combination Therapy for MDR Glioblastoma: Insights from
Article in Oncology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Glioblastoma (GB) therapy is challenged by tumor heterogeneity and multidrug resistance (MDR), highlighting the need for effective therapies. This study aimed to explore the combined anticancer effects of Sunitinib (SNB) and Fenofibrate (FEN) on U87 cells. Methods: U87 cells were exposed to SNB, FEN, or their combination for 24 h, followed by evaluations of cell viability, migration, and clonogenic survival using MTT, scratch, and colony formation assays. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were quantified via the 2 Results: The results demonstrated that both SNB and FEN significantly reduced U87 cell viability, migration, and clonogenic potential, with the combination treatment exhibiting synergistic cytotoxicity. SNB alone markedly increased ROS levels, while FEN, individually or in combination, reduced oxidative stress. Although SNB diminished mitochondrial membrane potential, co-treatment with FEN restored MMP values close to control levels. Docking analyses revealed that SNB displayed strong affinities for TOP-II, JNK, and HDAC2, whereas FEN preferentially interacted with MMP-9, COX-2, CYP3A4, and GPX4, suggesting complementary mechanisms targeting oxidative stress, inflammation, and programmed cell death regulation. Conclusion: The combination of SNB and FEN represents a promising multi-targeted therapeutic approach against GB. SNB and FEN combination capable of modulating and reprogramming key molecular pathways involved in GB progression and MDR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.