Evidence mapPaperPMID 41930201Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Prognostic biomarkers related to PANoptosis in esophageal cancer and their immune microenvironment: multi-omics analysis and therapeutic significance.

Runda Jie, Yining Liu, Tianbiao Wang, Shabahaiti Wusiman, Hongda Ren, Wugelinisan Tuoheniyazi, Ling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Runda Jie *Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Endemic Diseases; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Yining Liu *Laboratory Department, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Occupational Disease Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Tianbiao WangXinjiang Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Endemic Diseases; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Shabahaiti WusimanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, You'ai Hospital, Urumqi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Hongda RenDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Wugelinisan TuoheniyaziXinjiang Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Endemic Diseases; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Ling LiuXinjiang Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Endemic Diseases; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCA) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. PANoptosis is an inflammatory programmed cell death pathway event regulated by the PANoptosome complex. Currently, there is limited research on the PANoptosis-related genes (PORGs) in ESCA. We aim to explore the prognostic biomarkers of PANoptosis in ESCA and their underlying mechanisms through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. Methods: In this study, we analyzed transcriptome and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differential expression analysis were used to identify PANoptosis-related differentially expressed genes (POR-DEGs) in esophageal cancer. Hub genes were screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression combined with machine learning models to construct diagnostic and prognostic models. The potential mechanisms of hub genes in esophageal cancer were preliminarily explored through gene immune infiltration and functional enrichment analysis. The differences and driving factors between high- and low-risk subgroups, as well as the regulation of PANoptosis by hub genes related to macrophages, were further revealed by immune assessment, drug sensitivity analysis, single-cell analysis, and molecular docking. Finally, the accuracy of model genes was verified by immunohistochemistry in clinical samples. Results: Firstly, 74 PANoptosis-related differentially expressed genes (POR-DEGs) were identified for further analysis. Among the 74 genes, CCT6A, GMNN, and HSPB6 were identified as hub genes, and the constructed diagnostic and prognostic models were valuable. The high-risk subgroup showed poor prognosis, immune exhaustion, significant activation of pDC-LILRA4 cells, poor response to immunotherapy, and moderate sensitivity to chemotherapy. Further exploration of the immune regulatory mechanism of prognostic biomarkers revealed that the three hub genes, CCT6A, GMNN, and HSPB6, were closely related to the ESCA immune microenvironment. The CCT6A targeted by the traditional Chinese medicine component quercetin may inhibit PANoptosis by promoting the differentiation of Mono-CD14 cells into TAM-SPP1 macrophages. Discussion: We constructed prognostic and diagnostic models using PANoptosis-related prognostic biomarkers, analyzed the differences and treatments between high-risk and low-risk groups, and revealed a new mechanism by which CCT6A may inhibit PANoptosis by promoting TAM-SPP1 differentiation, providing new targets and biomarkers for ESCA treatment.

Indexed as

CCT6Aesophageal cancerGMNNHSPB6PANoptosisprognostic markersquercetintumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41930201
PMCPMC13038434

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.