ReviewMedComm2026
Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Oncology: Principles, Clinical Development, and Future Directions.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive analysis of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targets in adenoid cystic carcinoma: examining antigen expression in relation to clinicopathological features, prognosis, and initial therapeutic outcomes.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Advances and Future Directions in Antibody-Drug Conjugates: From Paradigm Shifts to Data-Driven Design.Cancers · 2026Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Solid Tumor Oncology and the Frontier of Precision Immunosuppression: A Mechanistic, Translational, and Clinical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a major therapeutic modality in oncology, enabling the targeted delivery of highly potent cytotoxic agents while expanding the therapeutic window in solid tumors. Recent clinical successes across breast, lung, and genitourinary cancers have highlighted that ADC efficacy is governed not only by target expression, but also by the integrated optimization of antibody engineering, linker chemistry, payload selection, and tumor-specific biology. In this review, we summarize the fundamental principles underpinning ADC design, including antibody format and Fc engineering, linker stability, payload classes, drug-to-antibody ratio optimization, and the bystander effect. We then discuss tumor antigen biology and target landscapes across solid tumors, with particular emphasis on how antigen density, heterogeneity, internalization kinetics, and intracellular trafficking shape clinical activity. Uro-oncological malignancies-especially urothelial carcinoma-are presented as a clinically advanced and instructive paradigm for ADC development. Experience from these tumors illustrates both the opportunities and limitations of ADC therapy, including mechanisms of response and resistance, biomarker-driven patient selection, rational combination strategies, and safety management in real-world practice. Finally, we provide a forward-looking perspective on next-generation ADC development, highlighting emerging conjugation technologies, bispecific and conditionally activated ADCs, strategies to overcome resistance, and evolving clinical trial designs. By integrating engineering principles with tumor biology and clinical execution, this review aims to offer a translational framework to guide the future development and implementation of ADCs across oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.