ReviewMedComm2026
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Astrocytomas: Risk Stratification and Therapeutic Advance.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytomas are recognized as a single molecular entity spanning CNS WHO Grades 2-4, and clinical behavior is shaped by early lineage-defining alterations (IDH1/2, ATRX, TP53) and by later events linked to malignant transformation (e.g., CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion). Despite integrated grading, substantial prognostic heterogeneity is observed, and treatment decisions are increasingly informed by multidomain risk stratification rather than grade alone. In this review, contemporary molecular classification and diagnostic principles are summarized, and pragmatic risk models integrating clinical factors, histomolecular features, and imaging/radiomics markers are synthesized. Standard therapies (maximal safe resection, involved-field radiotherapy, and alkylating chemotherapy) are reviewed in a grade-spanning, risk-adapted framework. Therapeutic advances are highlighted, with particular emphasis on brain-penetrant IDH inhibition (vorasidenib) and on emerging strategies including vaccines, checkpoint combinations, epigenetic modulation, metabolic and microenvironment targeting, and novel delivery platforms. Mechanisms of resistance and recurrence, including therapy-driven hypermutation and clonal evolution, are discussed alongside practical salvage considerations. Finally, future directions in trial design, survivorship-oriented endpoints, and biomarker-driven monitoring are outlined. A trajectory-based paradigm is emphasized in which neurocognitive preservation, time to radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and patient-reported outcomes are prioritized while durable disease control is pursued across decades-long survivorship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.