ReviewMolecular medicine reports2026
Current research progress on extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells in tuberculosis treatment (Review).
Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell‑derived extracellular vesicles (MSC‑EVs) have garnered research attention due to their unique biological functionalities and therapeutic potential. Compared with the parent MSCs from which they originate, MSC‑EVs are typically free from systemic allergic reactions, hemolysis, pyrogenic reactions, abnormal hematological changes, and vascular and muscle irritation problems, and thus, exhibit therapeutic potential. The present review provides a comprehensive analysis of numerous isolation methodologies for MSC‑EVs, with each method being evaluated based on key parameters, including principles, advantages, limitations and applications. Notably, the therapeutic potential of MSC‑EVs in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) has been emphasized. MSC‑EVs have demonstrated unique capacities to modulate the T helper cell (Th)1/Th2/T regulatory cell balance, promote M2 macrophage polarization, alleviate inflammation through microRNA‑mediated mechanisms and enhance host defense through antimicrobial peptide responses. The integration of MSC‑EVs with anti‑TB therapy can improve lung, kidney and bladder health by reducing TNF‑α levels and increasing IL‑10/TGF‑β ratios. Notably, functional discrepancies between EVs derived from distinct MSC sources, such as umbilical cord vs. bone marrow cells, underscore the need for targeted optimization strategies. Adequate risk assessment is important before clinical trials, particularly concerning immunogenicity, potential pro‑inflammatory effects and promotion of TB latency. The present review explores the potential clinical applications of MSC‑EVs in TB and other infectious diseases, offering key insights into their therapeutic potential, with the aim of guiding future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.