ArticlePloS one2026
The impact of the radical urbanization index on depression risk among middle-aged and elderly Chinese: Evidence from a large-scale cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid urbanization in China, while boosting socioeconomic development, has triggered "radical urbanization" characterized by land expansion outpacing population growth and economic activity. This spatial mismatch manifests as high building vacancy rates and underutilized infrastructure. Although urbanization is linked to mental health outcomes, evidence on radical urbanization's impact on depression-especially among middle-aged and elderly populations-remains scarce.
methodsThis cross-sectional study utilized 2011 baseline data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), including 11,126 participants aged ≥45 years. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the CES-D scale (score ≥10 = clinically significant). The radical urbanization index was calculated as the log ratio of city-level built-up area (from China City Statistical Yearbook) to aggregated nighttime light DN values (using thresholds: eastern China ≥34, western China ≥25). Multivariable logistic regression (three adjusted models) and restricted cubic splines evaluated associations. Subgroup analyses and machine learning models (AUC comparison) further validated findings.
results(1) Radical urbanization index was significantly higher in the depressive symptoms (DS) group vs. non-depressive symptoms (NDS) group (-4.74 vs. -4.96, *p* < 0.001). (2) Each 1-unit increase in the index elevated depression risk by 26% (OR=1.26, 95% CI:1.14-1.38; fully adjusted Model 3). (3) A dose-response relationship emerged: Q4 (highest index) had 1.68 × higher depression risk than Q1 (lowest) (*p*-trend<0.001). (4) Stronger associations occurred in central/western China (e.g., Hunan, Sichuan), low-education groups (OR=1.31), and rural residents (OR=1.30). (5) Adding the index to prediction models improved test-set AUC from 0.649 to 0.663.
conclusionRadical urbanization-reflecting inefficient land-use and economic-population mismatch-is independently associated with depression among Chinese middle-aged and elderly adults. Findings underscore the need to reorient urbanization policies from "land expansion" to "human-centered" development to mitigate mental health burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.