ArticleOpen heart2026
Periprocedural evaluation of patients with BAV stenosis undergoing TAVR: a machine learning-based study.
Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has increasingly emerged as one of the primary treatments for patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. Nevertheless, these patients encounter multiple procedural challenges.
objectiveTo develop a machine learning (ML) model for assessing the risk of periprocedural adverse events (PAEs) in TAVR population with BAV.
methodsThis multicentre study retrospectively enrolled 1266 patients with BAV stenosis. Clinical characteristics and imaging data of the patients were collected, and an ML prediction model was developed. PAE was collectively defined as all-cause death, disabling stroke, life-threatening haemorrhage, acute kidney injury (≥stage 3), major vascular complications, valve-related dysfunction necessitating reoperation and other major complications that occurred prior to discharge.
resultsThe average age was 72.6±6.3 years, and 58.3% (n=738) of male. In the derivation dataset, five predictive factors were identified: Type 0 BAV, aortic root calcification volume, horizontal aorta, annular ellipticity and previous atrial fibrillation. A robust risk scoring model was thereby established (area under the curve=0.801 95% CI 0.768 to 0.832). A graded relationship was observed between the quartiles of the score and PAE (0.6%, 1.7%, 3.2% and 9.6%; overall p<0.001). A nomogram was constructed to enable calculation of individual scores and the corresponding PAE probabilities. Additionally, similar results were observed in the validation dataset.
conclusionsThe ML model developed in this study could predict the PAEs occurrence of TAVR in patients with BAV stenosis. This is conducive to individualised procedural planning and in-hospital management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.