ArticleScientific reports2026
Single-channel EEG-based seizure prediction using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable seizure prediction can improve patient safety by enabling timely protective actions, yet most high-performing approaches depend on multichannel EEG, limiting feasibility in wearable and low-power environments. This study developed an ultralight deep learning model for seizure prediction using only single-channel EEG and evaluated its clinical applicability under predefined, clinically actionable criteria: a seizure prediction horizon (SPH) of 2 minutes and a seizure occurrence period (SOP) of 30 minutes. A 37,985-parameter MobileNet-derived architecture was designed to process STFT spectrograms and validated using patient-specific leave-one-out cross-validation on the SNUH and CHB-MIT datasets. Performance was assessed using segment-based accuracy and false positive rate (FPR), along with event-based sensitivity computed under SPH-SOP constraints. The model demonstrated strong and consistent performance across both datasets. In the SNUH cohort, it achieved 85.97% accuracy, an FPR of 0.130, and 94.93% sensitivity, successfully predicting 95.08% of seizures within the SOP window. In the CHB-MIT dataset, it reached 90.72% accuracy, an FPR of 0.092, and 97.92% sensitivity. These findings provide the first evidence that single-channel EEG can support reliable seizure prediction within clinically meaningful early-warning windows. The proposed lightweight model delivers multichannel-comparable performance while drastically reducing computational demand, demonstrating strong potential for real-time deployment in wearable and patient-centered epilepsy management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.