ArticleScientific reports2026
Imposter syndrome as mediator and moderator between personality and mental health in Malaysian students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explored whether Imposter Syndrome functions as a mediator or a moderator in the relationship between personality traits and mental health outcomes among university students in Malaysia. A total of 755 students completed validated measures of personality (IPIP-NEO), Imposter Syndrome (CIPS), and mental health (GHQ-28). We used structural equation modeling (SEM) to estimate bootstrapped indirect effects for mediation and tested moderation by including personality x Imposter Syndrome interaction terms in SEM. Imposter Syndrome showed small but significant indirect effects linking both Neuroticism (β = 0.102, p < 0.001) and Agreeableness (β= -0.024, p = 0.014) to mental health problems. In the moderation model, the Conscientiousness x Imposter Syndrome interaction (β = 0.07, p < 0.001) and the Neuroticism x Imposter Syndrome interaction (β = − 0.04, p < 0.001) were statistically significant but small in predicting mental health problems. These findings indicate that although Imposter Syndrome showed statistically detectable mediating and moderating associations for some personality traits, the effects were small and likely of limited practical significance. Overall, Imposter Syndrome did not consistently function as a robust mechanism (mediation) or boundary condition (moderation) across the Big Five traits. Future research should identify mechanisms beyond impostor feelings (e.g., self-regulatory capacities) that may better explain the link between personality traits and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.