ArticleOncogene2026
Pre-operative circulating tumor cells predict worse treatment outcome in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Article in Oncogene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CellSearch-based isolation of circulating tumor cells from ascitic fluid enables molecular characterization of ovarian cancer.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Pre- and post-operative, non-invasive biomarkers for reliable treatment outcome prediction, (minimal) residual disease detection, and prognosis are not yet established in clinical practice for these patients. This prospective study quantified circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in 7.5 ml peripheral blood in 56 women with FIGO stages IIIC and IV HGSOC before and after primary cytoreductive surgery and in 9 women with benign ovarian disease. Clinical outcomes were assessed during the median follow-up of 35.4 months. CTCs were detected in 48.2% (27/56) of patients pre-operatively and in 46.4% (26/56) post-operatively, but not in benign controls. Pre-operative CTCs were associated with suboptimal cytoreductive surgery (OR = 15.6, 95% CI: 2.97-127.0, p = 0.0031), worse platinum response (p = 0.0173), lymph node metastases (p = 0.0151), and shorter progression-free (p = 0.0045) and overall survival (p = 0.0241). Post-operative CTC-augmented residual tumor was significantly associated with worse OS (p = 0.047). In multivariable analyses, pre-operative CTCs remained an independent surrogate marker for incomplete debulking, platinum resistance, and poor survival in HGSOC. Therefore, the quantification of CTCs in HGSOC pre- and post-operatively may be used to guide treatment selection, reduce surgical morbidity, improve the healthcare provider's resource allocation and planning, and enhance patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.