ArticleScientific reports2026
Comprehensive analysis of programmed cell death and oridonin target identification in primary lung cancer for prognostic prediction and therapeutic strategies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the involvement of Oridonin-related prognostic genes in programmed cell death (PCD) in primary lung cancer and constructed a corresponding prognostic model. Transcriptomic, mutation, and clinical data from the TCGA database, including the TCGA-LUSC (Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma) and TCGA-LUAD (Lung Adenocarcinoma) cohorts with 989 primary lung cancer samples, were analyzed. A total of 38 potential Oridonin-related target genes were identified from the PubChem database, among which 15 demonstrated prognostic significance. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) revealed correlations between these genes and 13 types of PCD. LASSO and random forest algorithms constructed risk score models and identified FLNC and FOSL1 as independent prognostic biomarkers. Molecular docking analysis confirmed strong binding affinities between FLNC, FOSL1, and Oridonin, suggesting their potential as therapeutic targets. The results showed that the tumor mutation burden (TMB) of the high-risk group was significantly higher than that of the low-risk group. Analysis of immune profiles revealed that the heterogeneity in risk scores was closely linked to distinct patterns of immune cell infiltration and differential activation of immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, experimental validation through Western blot demonstrated elevated protein expression of FLNC and FOSL1 in tumor cell lines, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) confirmed their high expression in tumor tissues. The results highlight the critical role of FLNC and FOSL1 as prognostic markers in lung cancer, while also providing new perspectives on the development of Oridonin-based therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.