ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting urinary incontinence at 6 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary incontinence adversely affects quality of life as a common complication after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). To address this, our study sought to build and explain a machine learning (ML) model for predicting 6-month post-RARP incontinence risk. This single-center retrospective analysis enrolled 852 patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RARP from January 2021 to December 2024. Models were developed employing seven ML algorithms. Their performance was primarily evaluated through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Subsequently, the optimal model was interpreted using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis. The final model incorporated seven key predictors: prostate volume, membranous urethral length (MUL), age, body mass index (BMI), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), T stage, and basal surgical margin status. In the testing set, the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.784 and an accuracy of 0.793. Through SHAP analysis, intuitive visualizations were generated to illustrate how each feature contributed to individual risk predictions. This ML-based prediction model accurately estimates the risk of urinary incontinence at 6 months after RARP and demonstrates favorable clinical utility. This tool provides a dependable means for timely detection and risk classification of patients at elevated risk, potentially enabling the adoption of tailored preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.