ArticleBMC nursing2026
Evaluation of a strategy developed to revise the scope of practice to recognize midwife specialists' competencies in South Africa.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality remain major global public health challenges, even in South Africa. These challenges have necessitated the expansion of midwives' knowledge and skill through postgraduate training, preparing them as midwife specialists. Despite their advanced training and competencies, current scope of practice regulations does not fully recognize South African midwife specialists' expanded roles and capabilities. This regulatory gap limits their ability to practise to the full extent of their expertise and constrains their potential contribution to improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
objectiveTo evaluate a strategy to revise the scope of practice to recognize midwife specialists' competencies in South Africa.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative research design using an expert review methodology to evaluate a strategy aimed at revising the scope of practice to recognize midwife specialists' knowledge and skills in South Africa. A purposive sampling strategy followed by a snowball sampling method was used to identify 19 experts to evaluate the strategies guided by Chinn, Kramer and Sitzman's theory evaluation framework via an online platform.
resultsThe strategy to revise the scope of practice was found to be clear, simple, generalizable, accessible, and clinically significant within midwife specialists' practice. While the strategy was generally considered relevant, experts highlighted potential implementation challenges, including anticipated resistance from regulatory bodies and obstetricians.
conclusionsAlthough the proposed strategy to revise the scope of practice for midwife specialists was found relevant to the midwifery field, experts emphasized that its successful implementation requires collaborative effort. The strategy may grant midwife specialists formal professional autonomy, enhancing their ability to contribute optimally to clinical practice and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.