Observational studyJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Development and validation of a nomogram-based risk prediction model for postoperative delirium in patients with stanford type A aortic dissection.
Observational study in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious neurological complication following surgical repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD), and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram-based risk prediction model for POD in patients with TAAD.
methodsThis prospective observational study included patients who underwent surgical treatment for TAAD at a cardiac surgery center in Nanjing between August 2021 and June 2023. Clinical data were collected prospectively, and mental status was assessed continuously until discharge. Patients were divided into delirium and non-delirium groups based on the occurrence of POD. Risk factors for POD were identified using multivariate logistic regression, best subset selection, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare model performance and determine the optimal predictive model.
resultsA total of 510 patients were included, among whom 253 (49.61%) developed POD. The logistic regression-based model demonstrated the best predictive performance. Independent risk factors for POD included smoking, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m
conclusionsThe proposed nomogram-based model effectively predicts the risk of POD in patients undergoing surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. It may assist clinicians in early identification of high-risk patients and facilitate timely preventive and therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.