Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41934648›Full record

ArticleKidney & blood pressure research2026

A Comprehensive Report on the Self-Reported Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in the NHANES Cross-Sectional Cohort from 2001 to 2020.

Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Muhammad Nadeem Ahsan, Sadia Iqbal, Afsana Ansari Shaik, Maria Duharte, Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah Eljack, Moustafa Hegazi, Chad K Brands

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney & blood pressure research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Sohaib AsgharDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Sebring, Sebring, Florida, USA.
Muhammad Nadeem AhsanDepartment of Nephrology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sadia IqbalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Afsana Ansari ShaikDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Maria DuharteSouth Florida State College, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah EljackFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Bakhtalruda, Ed Dueim, Sudan, m.mahmmoud96@gmail.com.
Moustafa HegaziDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Sebring, Sebring, Florida, USA.
Chad K BrandsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Sebring, Sebring, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was a comprehensive review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES) databases. The primary objectives were to ascertain patterns of demographic and clinical data among chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients.

methodsThis study examines participants from the CDC NHANES database to identify the population diagnosed with CKD or dialysis patients from 2001 to 2020. The total cohort of 51,743 patients were included in each group; i.e., CKD group included 1,509 patients (out of which 173 patients have received dialysis in the past 12 months), while non-CKD group included 50,234 patients. Exclusion criteria included age >85 years (n = 624), pregnancy (n = 1,375), and history of malignancy (n = 5,575). Logistic regression was performed to identify conditions that were more frequently observed with CKD and those on dialysis with reported odds ratios (ORs). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate diagnostic accuracies of different cut-offs for urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR).

resultsThe mean age of study participants (n = 51,743) was 48.50 ± 17.43 years. Age was significantly higher in CKD group, but there was no difference in dialysis versus nondialysis patients (p = 0.833). There was no gender predisposition in CKD patients; however, males were more likely to undergo dialysis with 13.3% vs. 9.8% in females (p = 0.032). Among racial differences, non-Hispanic Whites were predominantly affected by CKD (37.0%) followed by non-Hispanic Blacks (29.3%), but non-Hispanic Blacks are mostly undergoing dialysis (48.6% vs. 17.3%). BMI (kg/m2) was significantly higher in CKD group (p < 0.001), but lower in dialysis group (p = 0.039). Among urinary complaints, history of kidney stones was prevalent in CKD patients (7.7% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001). Frequent coexisting comorbidities were congestive heart failure (OR: 9.8), diabetes (OR: 5.4), coronary artery disease (OR: 5.0), and hypertension (OR: 4.7). UACR (>30 mg/g) is able to categorize CKD patients (AUC: 0.73), at a sensitivity of 44.9% and a specificity of 88.8%.

conclusionCertain clinical factors were identified as highly associated with CKD, as disseminated by the NHANES database findings. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address CKD disparities and inform public health strategies.

Indexed as

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicSelf ReportAdultAgedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRenal DialysisUnited StatesChronic kidney diseaseDialysisEpidemiologyPreventionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41934648
PMCPMC13262993

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.