ArticleBlood cancer journal2026
Dynamics of BCMA expression in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is limited systemic data on the dynamics of BCMA-target antigen expression with BCMA CAR-T at relapse. We analyzed 76 patients receiving standard-of-care BCMA-directed CAR-T who underwent real-time BCMA expression evaluation at baseline (n = 50), relapse (6), or both (20) using flow cytometry (FC) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC). BCMA was universally expressed at baseline with significant heterogeneity in expression level. No concordance was seen between FC and IHC in categorizing high vs. low expression (Spearman: 0.07, Cohen kappa: 0). Plasma cell BCMA expression by FC correlated with clinical outcomes, whereas IHC did not. High BCMA expression by FC was associated with increased likelihood for VGPR/CR (p = 0.007) and longer time to progression (p = 0.005), including the ciltacabtagene autoleucel cohort (median: 23.0 vs. 7.7 months, p = 0.02). Relapsed patients retained BCMA expression by FC, though 29% (5/16) had BCMA loss by IHC, with 4/5 showing concurrent positive BCMA expression by FC. BCMA expression at relapse by FC was significantly lower than baseline (p = 0.04); downregulation (≥25% decrease) occurred in 50% (8/16) with paired samples. Higher BCMA expression by FC correlated with higher likelihood of deep, durable responses following BCMA-directed CAR-T. While BCMA loss is rare, decreased expression is common at relapse, with implications for sequencing BCMA-directed therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.