ArticleScientific reports2026
Honey environmental DNA reveals entomological fingerprints through dual mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and cytochrome b (CYTB) metabarcoding.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Honey carries environmental DNA (eDNA) from organisms encountered by honey bees and can therefore encode an “entomological fingerprint” of agricultural and forest landscapes. We compared two metabarcoding assays targeting mitochondrial regions (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1, COI; and cytochrome b, CYTB) to profile plant-sucking insects (Hemiptera) in honey samples from Italy and Türkiye, including citrus blossom, polyfloral, and honeydew honey samples. We designed a new short CYTB primer pair optimised for Aphididae and evaluated it alongside our previously published Hemiptera-COI assay. Across 3.51 million reads, our pipeline assigned 1.25 million COI and 1.48 million CYTB reads to Neoptera. CYTB resolved more taxa per sample (mean 7.9 families, 36 species) than COI (4.5 families, 11.7 species) and yielded a higher proportion of species-level assignments (98.3% vs. 43.7%). COI captured Metcalfa pruinosa (Flatidae) where abundant—often dominating polyfloral honey samples—whereas CYTB revealed fine-scale diversity of aphids relevant to citrus orchards and conifer/oak forests. Short-amplicon haplotype screening recovered multiple COI haplotypes for M. pruinosa, Thelaxes suberi, Cinara cedri and Aphis gossypii, suggesting potential for population monitoring from honey eDNA. Our results show that combining complementary metabarcodes mitigates primer and database biases and enhances landscape-scale inference, honey authentication, and surveillance of invasive or pest hemipterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.