ReviewEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2026
Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in 2025.
Review in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Innovation and constraints in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent advances in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, prevention and treatment of many cardiovascular diseases remain limited with a clear need for more effective and safer pharmacological strategies. Here, we summarize the most relevant advances in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in 2025, including the approval of four new drugs (aficamten, etripamil, lerodalcibep, and plozasiran), the label expansions for five already approved drugs, and the results of major randomized clinical trials with already approved drugs, including those that met the prespecified primary endpoints (positive trials) representing new pharmacological options for cardiovascular diseases, those with neutral or negative results, which did not confirm the primary endpoints and the withdrawal from the US market of Andexanet-alfa for safety concerns. Finally, we present the most promising experimental cardiovascular drugs currently being investigated in ongoing Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.