Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41936201›Full record

ReviewMedical image analysis2026

Harmonization in magnetic resonance imaging: A survey of acquisition, image-level, and feature-level methods.

Qinqin Yang, Firoozeh Shomal-Zadeh, Ali Gholipour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical image analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qinqin YangDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, 92697, USA. Electronic address: qinqin.yang@uci.edu.
Firoozeh Shomal-ZadehDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 44106, USA. Electronic address: fshomal92@gmail.com.
Ali GholipourDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, 92697, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, 92697, USA. Electronic address: agholipo@hs.uci.edu.

Funding

Next-generation in-vivo fetal neuroimagingR01EB031849 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GHOLIPOUR-BABOLI, ALI · 2021 to 2024
$2.2M
Imaging early development of human neural circuitsR01HD109395 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ALI GHOLIPOUR-BABOLI · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Enhanced Imaging of the Fetal Brain MicrostructureR01EB032366 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GHOLIPOUR-BABOLI, ALI · 2022 to 2025
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031849NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032366NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD109395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has greatly advanced neuroscience research and clinical diagnostics. However, imaging data collected across different scanners, acquisition protocols, or imaging sites often exhibit substantial heterogeneity, known as "batch effects" or "site effects." These non-biological sources of variability can obscure true biological signals, reduce reproducibility and statistical power, and severely impair the generalizability of learning-based models across datasets. Image harmonization is grounded in the central hypothesis that site-related biases can be eliminated or mitigated while preserving meaningful biological information, thereby improving data comparability and consistency. This review provides a comprehensive overview of key concepts, methodological advances, publicly available datasets, and evaluation metrics in the field of MRI harmonization. We systematically cover the full imaging pipeline and categorize harmonization approaches into prospective acquisition and reconstruction, retrospective image-level and feature-level methods, and traveling-subject-based techniques. By synthesizing existing methods and evidence, we revisit the central hypothesis of image harmonization and show that, although site invariance can be achieved with current techniques, further evaluation is required to verify the preservation of biological information. To this end, we summarize the remaining challenges and highlight key directions for future research, including the need for standardized validation benchmarks, improved evaluation strategies, and tighter integration of harmonization methods across the imaging pipeline.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansReproducibility of ResultsDeep learningImage harmonizationMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID41936201
PMCPMC13589312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.