ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026
Barriers and facilitators to recruitment, engagement, and retention of underrepresented populations in dementia prevention research: a scoping review.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Underrepresented populations in dementia prevention research, including minoritized racial/ethnic groups, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and others facing social and structural disadvantages, are disproportionately affected by dementia risk. This scoping review examined barriers and facilitators to recruitment, engagement, and retention of these populations in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) prevention studies, synthesizing evidence from both empirical studies and review articles. Guided by PRISMA-ScR and the conceptual structure described by Gilmore-Bykovskyi et al., findings were synthesized from 19 reviews and 53 empirical studies. Findings were interpreted with attention to how overlapping factors-such as ethnicity, age, gender, and structural inequities-may influence study participation. Studies originated primarily from the United States (U.S.). Five key themes were identified: 1) mistrust, 2) stigma and limited research literacy, 3) logistical and financial constraints, 4) communication gaps and lack of team diversity, and 5) systemic-level barriers. Facilitators included culturally tailored outreach, long-term community partnerships, and inclusive study design. Retention strategies remain underreported, and little is known about the non-U.S. context. These findings highlight the need for context-specific, multi-level strategies that address the intersecting barriers faced by underrepresented groups to support equitable participation in dementia prevention research, and ultimately, dementia prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.