ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026
Clinical impact of a multidisciplinary remote-based hybrid antibiotic stewardship program in critically ill patients during COVID-19 pandemic in Korea: a prospective pilot implementation study.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are recommended to optimize antibiotic use in intensive care units (ICUs); however, many institutions lack infectious disease specialists and pharmacy expertise for full implementation. The COVID-19 pandemic further disrupted conventional stewardship. While tele-stewardship models have shown promise, evidence for hybrid programs operating without infectious disease specialist leadership remains limited, particularly outside high-income countries. We developed a hybrid ASP (hASP) collaboratively led by an on-site intensivist and an off-site faculty clinical pharmacist to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use and improve outcomes in a resource-constrained ICU.
methodsThis prospective, single-center, pre-post study was conducted in the medical ICU of a 733-bed university teaching hospital in Seoul, South Korea. The pre-intervention period (August to October 2017) with no ASP was compared with the post-intervention period (August to October 2020) following hASP implementation. Stewardship activities were primarily performed off-site by trained clinical pharmacists via secured messaging, telephone, and video conferencing, with on-site rounds every other weekday. Key outcomes were inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions per 100 patient-days, 30-day all-cause mortality, ICU length of stay, preventable adverse drug events, and days of therapy, assessed using Delphi-derived appropriateness criteria.
resultsThirty-three and 37 admissions were analyzed (364 and 251 patient-days). On-site activities were limited to three hours daily or less. Inappropriate prescriptions declined from 83.8 to 20.7 per 100 patient-days (p < 0.001), ICU length of stay from 14 to 6 days (p < 0.05), and preventable adverse drug events from 4.4 to 2.8 per 100 patient-days (p < 0.05). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was comparable (24.2% vs. 24.3%). The most frequent pharmacist interventions were dose optimization (47.8%) and antimicrobial discontinuation (40.6%), with an overall acceptance rate of 62.3%. Days of therapy for broad-spectrum antibiotics targeting multidrug-resistant organisms declined while those for narrower-spectrum agents increased, suggesting a shift toward targeted therapy.
conclusionThe hASP, collaboratively led by an intensivist and a faculty clinical pharmacist with off-site pharmacist-led interventions via virtual communication, significantly reduced inappropriate prescribing, ICU length of stay, and preventable adverse drug events. Hybrid stewardship models may serve as a feasible alternative to on-site programs in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.