SynthesisEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2026
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ecnoglutide in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects over 500 million people worldwide, with traditional therapies often failing to maintain long-term glycaemic control. Ecnoglutide, a novel long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ecnoglutide in adults with T2DM.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar through September 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing ecnoglutide with placebo or active comparators in adults with T2DM were included. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and body weight. Secondary outcomes included fasting plasma glucose, insulin resistance markers, lipid profile, liver enzymes, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models, with mean differences and risk ratios calculated at 95% confidence intervals.
resultsFour RCTs comprising 1643 participants (1162 receiving ecnoglutide, 444 controls) were included. Ecnoglutide significantly reduced HbA1c (MD = -0.44, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.33, p < 0.00001), body weight (MD = -5.63, 95% CI -7.90 to -3.35, p < 0.01), and fasting plasma glucose (MD = -0.81, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.59, p < 0.00001). Improvements were observed in insulin sensitivity, lipid profile, and liver enzymes. Adverse events occurred more frequently with ecnoglutide (RR = 1.09, p < 0.01), although predominantly gastrointestinal and mild-to-moderate, with no significant differences in serious adverse events.
conclusionsEcnoglutide demonstrates robust efficacy in glycaemic control, weight reduction, and cardiometabolic parameters with an acceptable safety profile in adults with T2DM, supporting its therapeutic potential as a next-generation GLP-1 receptor agonist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.