ReviewReproductive medicine and biology
Endometrial Microbiome and Implantation: From Basic Knowledge to Clinical Medicine.
Review in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing the Endometrial Factor in Recurrent Implantation Failure: From Established Diagnostics to Mechanism-Informed Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Implantation Outcome-Specific Associations Between Stromal Senescence and the Endometrial Microbiota.Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is an infertility condition in which uterine factors remain difficult to diagnose and treat. Recent studies implicate the endometrial microbiome in implantation. Methods: This clinically oriented narrative review summarizes female reproductive tract microbiota and evidence on endometrial microbiome testing and management in infertility. Main Findings Results: Vaginal dysbiosis is linked to adverse reproductive outcomes and provides a reference for interpreting upper-tract findings. Endometrial microbial signals are detectable by sequencing, but interpretation is challenged by the low-biomass environment and vulnerability to carry-over, kitome effects, and contamination. Across ART studies, a Conclusion: Evidence is rapidly evolving, yet observational designs and methodological variability limit causal inference. Future progress will require standardized sampling and contamination controls, outcome-anchored threshold validation, and pragmatic real-world evaluations of protocolized test-and-treat pathways using clinically meaningful endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.