ArticleJAACAP open2026
Are Differences in Social Drive in Childhood and Adolescence Diagnosis Specific? A Multimeasurement Subtyping Approach.
Article in JAACAP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Altered social drive is a common feature across psychiatric disorders and is embedded in multiple diagnostic criteria, underscoring the need for a transdiagnostic approach. However, the extent to which social drive alterations vary across diagnoses and clinical presentations remains poorly characterized. This study examined whether distinct social drive profiles-defined by differences in social reticence, seeking, and maintaining challenges-relate to variations in clinical features and show specificity to particular neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric conditions. Method: Data were drawn from the Healthy Brain Network (N = 2,380; ages 5-21 years, mean [SD] age = 10.27 [3.39] years; 68% male) and included youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorders, autism spectrum disorder, oppositional defiant/conduct disorder, depressive disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and tic disorders. Latent profile analysis identified distinct social drive profiles based on constellations of social reticence, seeking, and maintaining challenges. Profiles were compared across demographic, social functioning, and clinical measures, and the distribution of diagnostic categories within each profile was assessed. Results: Five profiles emerged: engaged (n = 1,530), inhibited (n = 477), aloof (n = 189), avoidant (n = 143), and constrained (n = 50). Profile differences were evident in demographic factors, social functioning, and clinical features. No single diagnosis mapped exclusively onto any profile; rather, participants with distinct neurodevelopmental or neuropsychiatric diagnoses were distributed across all 5 profiles. Conclusion: Psychiatric diagnoses alone may not fully capture alterations in social drive, which appear to transcend diagnostic boundaries. These findings support a transdiagnostic framework and challenge disorder-specific models of social drive differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.