ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
First results with "immunologic bypass" strategy in no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia: a case series.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Revascularization interventions are the gold-standard treatment to obtain limb salvage in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Unfortunately, almost 15% of patients are not eligible. Recent studies stressed the possible role of peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) promoting postnatal vasculogenesis in no-option CLTI patients through monocytes, reducing mortality and limb loss. In this case series, we present our first results with this clinical approach. Presentation of cases: We treated 18 no-option CLTI patients (with diabetes or vasculitis) with autologous cellular therapy using PB-MNCs in the last 6 years in our center. Eighty-nine percent of patients presented with foot lesions. The mean age of our patients was 72 years (43-90 years). Mean follow-up was 21.8 (2-48) months, and the median follow-up was 15 months. During the follow-up, we registered one major amputation at 1 month and another major amputation at 25 months. Two patients died, respectively, at 2nd and 3rd month follow-up (12th month death rate of 11%), and a third one died at 13 months follow-up (long-term death rate of 6%). All deaths were for causes not related to sepsis. Discussion: Our results are promising: at 12-month follow-up, only one patient had a major amputation intervention (5.6%), and two patients died (11%). These results are better than recent evidence in literature, even though the 2019 European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines consider this therapy investigational. Conclusion: In our experience, use of PB-MNCs in no-option CLTI patients appears safe and effective. Larger, controlled studies are needed, in particular with non-diabetic CLTI patients, to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.