Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938706›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2026

Interplay between genetically predicted gut microbiota and chronic apical periodontitis: a Mendelian randomization analysis.

Lijing Zhu, Yu Xie, Xuechao Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lijing ZhuDepartment of Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7710-8549
Yu XieSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xuechao YangDepartment of Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whether alterations in the gut microbiota play a causal role in chronic apical periodontitis (CAP) remains uncertain. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used in this study to assess the potential causal effect of gut microbiota on CAP risk. Methods: Gut microbiota summary statistics were from the MiBioGen consortium's largest GWAS, and CAP data from the FinnGen project. The inverse variance-weighted method was the main analytic approach, and sensitivity analyses verified instrument robustness. Results: Two microbial taxa showed positive causal effect with CAP: Conclusions: This MR analysis provides evidence of a genetic relationship between gut microbiota composition and susceptibility to CAP. The findings broaden our understanding of microbial changes in CAP-affected tissues, and suggest a genetic association between alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota and CAP risk.

Indexed as

causal effectchronic apical periodontitisgenome-wide association studyGut microbiotaMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID41938706
PMCPMC13045175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.