ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Influence of 5A-Based Self-Regulated Nursing Intervention on Self-Care Capability and Well-Being Among PCI Recipients with Coronary Heart Disease.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 5A-based self-management nursing intervention in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), focusing on its impact on self-care ability and quality of life. Methods: This retrospective study included CHD patients who underwent PCI at our hospital between September and December 2023. Based on nursing records, patients who received routine care were assigned to the control group, while those who additionally received a 5A-based self-management nursing intervention formed the intervention group. Eligible patients were identified according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical indicators and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between groups (P>0.05). After the intervention period, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), lower serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and longer distances in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) compared with the control group (P<0.05). Treatment adherence was also higher in the intervention group (P<0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months, patients in the intervention group achieved significantly better scores on the Coronary Heart Disease Self-Management Scale (CSMS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Barthel Index (BI), and Chinese Cardiovascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQQC) (P<0.05). Conclusion: The 5A-based self-management nursing intervention appears effective for CHD patients after PCI, improving cardiac function, exercise capacity, self-management behaviors, and overall quality of life. These findings support its potential for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.