Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938741›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026

Supporting Basic Psychological Needs in Medical Education: A Patient Best Practice.

Adam Neufeld, Gregory Guldner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam NeufeldDepartment of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-8100
Gregory GuldnerUniversity of California Riverside School of Medicine, US.ORCID 0000-0002-4818-4991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physician burnout remains a pervasive challenge in medical education, with significant implications for both physician well-being and the quality and safety of patient care. Despite growing awareness and interventions, medical educators often lack a cohesive theoretical framework that explains how learning environments can contribute to both burnout and clinical performance. This article highlights Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a robust, evidence-based lens through which to understand and address these challenges by emphasizing the fulfillment of three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Drawing on foundational and contemporary research across health professions education and healthcare, the authors argue that supporting these needs within clinical learning environments not only enhances learner motivation, engagement, and resilience, but also reduces burnout and its downstream effects on empathy, decision-making, teamwork, and patient outcomes. The authors recommend integrating SDT principles into the structure of medical training through curricular design, assessment strategies, faculty development, and institutional policies that support high-quality motivation. They propose that psychological need support should be regarded as a patient best practice and position SDT not only as a wellness framework, but as a clinical quality framework for strengthening learner development, reducing harm, and promoting safe, compassionate, and effective care. Ongoing research, collaboration, and faculty development will be essential to advancing this work across medical education systems.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalEducation, MedicalClinical CompetenceEmpathyHumansPersonal Autonomy

Identifiers

PMID41938741
PMCPMC13045799

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.