ReviewAnnals of intensive care2026
The time course of fluid responsiveness.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated haemodynamic monitoring of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance in critical care: from physiology to bedside applications.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid responsiveness (FR) is a cornerstone concept in the hemodynamic management of critically ill patients, referring to the heart's ability to increase output in response to fluid administration. This review explores the time course of FR, emphasizing its dynamic and transient nature influenced by various patient-specific factors and treatments. We highlight that FR is not a stable, binary state but rather a continuum that requires repeated evaluations using appropriate tools. We examine into factors affecting the temporal profile of FR, including the stage of resuscitation, fluid infusion rate, norepinephrine use, mechanical ventilation settings, systolic function, spontaneous breathing, and the patient's health condition. Understanding the duration and decay of the hemodynamic response is crucial for individualizing fluid therapy, potentially reducing the risks of both fluid overload and under-resuscitation. This review underscores the necessity of frequent reassessment of FR in critically ill patients and integrating this knowledge into personalized resuscitation protocols to improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.