ArticleJournal of extracellular biology2026
Ultracentrifugation and Ultrafiltration Differentially Alter the Composition and Functionality of the Biomolecular Corona of Extracellular Vesicles.
Article in Journal of extracellular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural killer cell-derived extracellular vesicles reprogram cellular human immunity to enhance tumor cytotoxicity.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Natural Killer Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Exhibit Cytotoxicity Against Bulk Tumor Cells and Cancer Stem Cells in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While extracellular vesicles (EVs) are increasingly recognized for their diagnostic and therapeutic potential, many unknowns remain. An emerging and important concept in EV biology is the EV biomolecular corona, a dynamic layer of absorbed biomolecules to the EV membrane that influences EV behaviour, cellular uptake, biodistribution and function. In de-coronisation studies, a key challenge involves identifying effective purification methods to selectively and reliably remove enzymatically digested surface proteins. This study assesses the effectiveness of ultracentrifugation (UC) and ultrafiltration (UF) purification techniques following proteinase K (PK) treatment of pre-isolated natural killer cell-derived EVs (NK-EVs). The efficiency and specificity/selectivity of these purification methods in removing cleaved proteins while preserving EV physical properties (size), biomolecular profile (surface immunophenotyping, cytokine and proteomic profiling) and cytotoxicity against cancer cells were evaluated. While both methods achieve comparable NK-EV particle recovery, only UF purification selectively removed PK-cleaved proteins, as depicted in the protein-to-particle ratio, biomolecular profiling and NK-EV cytotoxicity after PK treatment. In contrast, UC purification caused non-specific corona disruption, dramatically reducing the cytokine payloads and abolishing NK-EV cytotoxicity. Interestingly, NTA and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (positive staining) analyses showed that de-coronised EVs were smaller than their untreated counterpart. This finding suggests that PK treatment impacts surface-associated proteins with different sensitivity to proteolysis, an effect that remained consistent independent of the subsequent purification methods. Collectively, these results highlight UF as the purification method of choice for controlled de-coronisation studies, potentially supporting the advancements of EV research across multi-omics, investigatory, and preclinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.