ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
The role of artificial intelligence in early detection and risk prediction of ischemic heart disease.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, underscoring the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic strategies. Conventional methods, including electrocardiography (ECG), imaging, and biomarkers, are effective but limited by factors such as delayed biomarker elevation, reliance on expert interpretation, and variability across settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to enhance early detection and risk prediction by applying machine learning and deep learning to large, complex datasets. In ECG analysis, AI models consistently identify subtle ischemic patterns, including occlusive myocardial infarction, with accuracy that often rivals or exceeds clinicians. In imaging, AI enhances echocardiography, CT, MRI, and nuclear modalities by automating segmentation, strain analysis, and plaque quantification while reducing interpretation time. In biomarkers, AI augments traditional tools like troponins and enables the discovery of novel predictors through multi-omics and wearable data integration, supporting dynamic and individualized risk assessment. Despite promising results, most studies remain retrospective or single-center, with limited validation across diverse populations and healthcare environments. Key barriers include algorithm bias, generalizability, regulatory uncertainty, and limited clinician familiarity. Future progress will depend on multicenter trials, federated learning, explainable AI, and integration into existing workflows. In conclusion, AI has the potential to transform cardiovascular care by enabling earlier and more precise diagnosis of IHD and more personalized risk prediction. However, realizing this potential will require careful validation, equitable implementation, and collaboration across disciplines to ensure safe and effective adoption in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.