Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939671›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Leflunomide for Connective Tissue Diseases: A Narrative Review of Efficacy and Safety.

Balakrishnan Navaneethakrishnan, Mahabaleshwar Mamadapur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Balakrishnan NavaneethakrishnanDepartment of Rheumatology, Avinash Hospitals, Chennai , IND.
Mahabaleshwar MamadapurDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, JSS Academy of Higher Research, Mysuru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune disorders characterized by immune-mediated inflammation and multisystem involvement, frequently requiring long-term immunomodulatory therapy. Leflunomide, a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) with established efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), has increasingly been used off-label in various CTDs, although its clinical role remains incompletely defined. This narrative review synthesizes evidence published between 2015 and 2025 on the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in CTDs, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren's syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), and overlap syndromes. Available data, largely derived from small clinical trials, observational studies, and case series, indicate that leflunomide may offer clinically meaningful benefit in patients with predominant inflammatory musculoskeletal manifestations, particularly inflammatory arthritis, and may function as a steroid-sparing alternative in individuals who are intolerant of or inadequately responsive to methotrexate. The safety profile of leflunomide in CTD populations appears broadly comparable to that observed in RA when appropriate patient selection, counselling, and laboratory monitoring are employed. However, interpretation of current evidence is limited by heterogeneity in study designs, variable outcome measures, and a lack of disease-specific randomized controlled trials. Leflunomide occupies a defined but limited role as a second-line csDMARD in non-organ-threatening CTDs, highlighting the need for further high-quality studies to clarify its optimal positioning within CTD treatment algorithms.

Indexed as

connective tissue diseasesimmunomodulatory therapyinflammatory arthritisleflunomidesafety profile

Identifiers

PMID41939671
PMCPMC13049499

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.