ReviewResearch and reports in urology2026
Research Progress in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Upper Urinary Tract Stones: A Review.
Review in Research and reports in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, minimally invasive techniques have made significant advancements in the management of upper urinary tract stones and have become the mainstream treatment modality. The core procedures currently routinely performed include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and flexible ureteroscopy with lithotripsy (FURL). SWL is widely adopted due to its non-invasive advantage; however, its stone-free rate (SFR) can be affected by factors such as stone hardness, anatomical location, and patient body type. FURL (or RIRS) is performed through natural body cavities, resulting in minimal trauma; meanwhile, PCNL demonstrates significant efficiency advantages in managing large stone burdens. Currently, PCNL technology continues to evolve toward minimally invasive (miniaturization) and precision-oriented approaches. Concurrently, FURL technology has achieved significant breakthroughs through the integration of key innovations such as intelligent pressure control systems and flexible negative pressure suction sheaths. Therefore, systematically reviewing the latest advancements in minimally invasive surgical treatments for upper urinary tract stones and objectively evaluating their efficacy based on evidence-based medicine (such as comparing the clinical efficacy of PCNL versus FURL combined with novel negative pressure devices) will provide valuable practical guidance for clinicians in developing individualized and optimized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.