ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Microbiota-immune crosstalk in livestock: implications for tick-borne disease control.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, livestock health, which impacts animal welfare and agricultural productivity, is continuously threatened by tick-borne diseases (TBDs). The growing issues of acaricide overuse in livestock, emerging resistance, and vector adaptation to climate change require novel and sustainable intervention strategies. Recent advances in microbiome research reveal how host and vector microbiota influence immune responses, particularly through natural antibodies (nAbs) that modulate vector competence and pathogen transmission. In livestock, nAbs targeting microbial glycans are heritable, measurable, and linked to health outcomes. In cattle, nAb titers to bacterial antigens are associated with mastitis risk and longevity, while in pigs, early-life nAb levels are proposed as resilience markers. Studies in poultry further demonstrate the importance of high nAb phenotypes for health and production. These findings highlight nAbs as both immunological markers and potential targets for genetic selection to improve disease resistance. Emerging interventions, such as anti-microbiota vaccines and immunobiotics, aim to modulate nAb repertoires, disrupt pathogen colonization, and enhance disease resilience. Additionally, microbial glycans serve as key targets for inducing cross-reactive immunity against TBDs. Manipulation of the livestock microbiota through diet, probiotics, and prebiotics shows promise in diversifying nAb profiles and improving robustness against infection. Despite these advances, research gaps remain, particularly in establishing causality and practical feasibility in livestock systems. This review emphasizes the need for integrative research across immunology, microbiology, and veterinary sciences to leverage microbiota-immune interactions in enhancing livestock resilience against TBDs, exploring how nAbs shaped by the gut microbiota can modulate tick microbiomes and impact pathogen transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.