ArticleHealth and technology2026
Unifying the odyssey: artificial intelligence for rare disease diagnosis and therapy.
Article in Health and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To summarize current challenges in rare disease (RD) diagnosis and therapy, highlight recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for RDs, and propose a model future state for RD patient care. Methods: Multidisciplinary expert-led narrative review summarizing modern practical challenges and rate-limiting steps in RD patient care, citing key clinical and research considerations with respect to regulatory and economic constraints. Results: Over 10,000 known RDs collectively affect 1 in 10 Americans, a total of over 30 million people. Annually, RDs account for over $1 trillion of annual US healthcare expenditures. Despite advances in genomic medicine, it takes 5-8 years on average to obtain an accurate diagnosis, and less than 5% of RDs currently have FDA-approved therapies. In this article, we review the history of RD diagnosis and current healthcare gaps underlying the major failures in patient care. Next, we will highlight emerging advances in genomic medicine and AI that are rapidly changing the RD landscape. Finally, we propose a target future state that integrates agentic AI for diagnosis and therapy with human-in-the-loop feedback. Conclusions: The rare disease diagnostic and therapeutic odyssey represents healthcare's most persistent failure mode. Ongoing challenges for clinical implementation involve biological modeling, manufacturing bottlenecks, and clinical trial design. We propose strategies for artificial intelligence to restructure the traditional sequence of diagnosis-then-therapy into a proactive orchestrated system delivering personalized cures at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.