ReviewaBIOTECH2026
Artificial intelligence-driven discovery of bioactive peptides: Computational approaches and future perspectives.
Review in aBIOTECH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex Networks in Bioactive Peptide Research: A Methodological Review.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Functional Engineering of Bioactive Peptides: Chemical Modifications and Synthetic Biology Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Quantitative structure-activity relationship characterization and modeling of length-varying bioactive peptides.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioactive peptides, defined as amino acid chains exhibiting diverse biological functions such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities, are primarily generated through protein digestion methods including enzymatic hydrolysis, physical processing techniques and controlled microbial fermentation. Conventional discovery techniques that rely on multi-stage separation processes, such as enzymatic digestion, ultrafiltration, ion-exchange chromatography, gel filtration chromatography, and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) inherently demand substantial laboratory resources and extended timeframes. To address these limitations, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches have emerged as transformative discovery platforms. These computational pipelines systematically execute six critical phases: comprehensive data acquisition and curation, advanced feature engineering utilizing physicochemical descriptors, machine learning model construction using algorithms, iterative model training incorporating hyperparameter optimization, rigorous validation against benchmark datasets, and high-throughput bioactive peptide prediction. This comprehensive review critically evaluates recent AI applications across four key bioactive peptide categories including antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant peptides, anti-inflammatory peptides, and multifunctional variants. Furthermore, it proposes integrated enhancement strategies such as classifying peptides via their functional mechanism or using database-independent modeling approaches. Additionally, based on AI methods, scenario-specific peptide customization and prediction of bioactivity in digested proteomes are anticipated to be achieved in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.