ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2026
Biot's respiratory pattern under mechanical ventilation: Two case reports and literature review.
Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biot's breathing, first described in 1876, remains an underrecognized yet clinically relevant marker of pontomedullary dysfunction. In mechanically ventilated patients, its identification through ventilator waveforms provides an objective correlate of central respiratory control failure. Case presentation: We report two elderly female patients admitted to the intensive care unit for acute neurological deterioration, both requiring invasive mechanical ventilation initially delivered in controlled mandatory modes. After sedation withdrawal and transition to spontaneous ventilation, irregular clusters of breaths interspersed with apneic pauses were observed, consistent with Biot's respiratory pattern. In Case 1, neuroimaging showed a large hemispheric ischemic stroke without radiological evidence of brainstem involvement, suggesting a secondary or functional Biot-like pattern. In Case 2, brain MRI confirmed caudal brainstem ischemic involvement, correlating with the classic bulbar form of Biot's breathing. Both patients evolved with poor neurological outcomes. Conclusion: Mechanical ventilation enables objective documentation of Biot's breathing, transforming a historically clinical sign into a quantifiable physiological marker. Early recognition contributes to prognostic assessment and improves understanding of central respiratory control failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.