Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41941504›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Identifying minimal risk factors for adolescent suicidal ideation and suicide attempts: A machine learning-optimized approach.

Catherine Park, Beom-Chan Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine ParkDivision of Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-5098
Beom-Chan LeeDepartment of Health and Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5647-0170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to identify the minimal risk factors for adolescent suicidal behaviors, including suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (2022-2023), including 90,813 adolescents aged 12-18 years, were analyzed. Using multidimensional risk factors spanning sociodemographic, physical and mental health, and behavioral domains, we applied a Random Forest model combined with recursive feature elimination to identify a minimal subset of risk factors (optimal features). Model performance for identifying suicidal ideation and predicting suicide attempts was evaluated via area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics across the validation datasets. Sadness, loneliness, anxiety, and stress were identified as optimal features, achieving a high AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in identifying suicidal ideation and predicting suicide attempts. Additional factors further improved the ML model's predictive performance for suicide attempts, achieving an AUC of 97.28%, sensitivity of 93.49%, specificity of 90.21%, accuracy of 91.85%, a PPV of 90.52%, and an NPV of 93.26%. This study demonstrated the efficacy of ML-driven approaches in identifying critical risk factors for adolescent suicidal behaviors. The findings highlight the potential of ML frameworks to transform suicide prevention strategies and improve mental health outcomes in adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorMachine LearningSuicidal IdeationSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRepublic of KoreaRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41941504
PMCPMC13052902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.