ArticlePloS one2026
Identifying minimal risk factors for adolescent suicidal ideation and suicide attempts: A machine learning-optimized approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to identify the minimal risk factors for adolescent suicidal behaviors, including suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Data from the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (2022-2023), including 90,813 adolescents aged 12-18 years, were analyzed. Using multidimensional risk factors spanning sociodemographic, physical and mental health, and behavioral domains, we applied a Random Forest model combined with recursive feature elimination to identify a minimal subset of risk factors (optimal features). Model performance for identifying suicidal ideation and predicting suicide attempts was evaluated via area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics across the validation datasets. Sadness, loneliness, anxiety, and stress were identified as optimal features, achieving a high AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in identifying suicidal ideation and predicting suicide attempts. Additional factors further improved the ML model's predictive performance for suicide attempts, achieving an AUC of 97.28%, sensitivity of 93.49%, specificity of 90.21%, accuracy of 91.85%, a PPV of 90.52%, and an NPV of 93.26%. This study demonstrated the efficacy of ML-driven approaches in identifying critical risk factors for adolescent suicidal behaviors. The findings highlight the potential of ML frameworks to transform suicide prevention strategies and improve mental health outcomes in adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.