ArticleScientific reports2026
GACNet: A graph attention-based neural network for electroencephalography localization via contrastive learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Electroencephalography (EEG) based eye tracking methodology has encountered numerous obstacles due to the noisy, high-dimensional, and non-stationary characteristics inherent in brain data. In this study, we proposed a novel regression framework, named GACNet, which synergistically integrates a Graph Attention Network (GAT) for dynamic spatial modeling and supervised contrastive learning to enhance regression accuracy. For the encoder representation, we implement a temporal module that utilizes a 1D convolutional layer, channel-wise attention, and a bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) network. This configuration effectively captures both local and long-range temporal dependencies. Concurrently, the GAT-based spatial module treats the 129 EEG channels as a dynamic graph. It autonomously learns the importance of inter-channel relationships (edges) and node significance, effectively filtering irrelevant nodes and focusing on the most salient neural pathways for eye tracking. To further bolster the quality of representation, we employ a clustering-guided supervised contrastive (SupCon) loss, which ensures compactness among positive clusters while maximizing the separation from negative samples within the learned feature space. This is coupled with a joint optimization strategy that integrates regression loss, enabling the model to cultivate discriminative and task-relevant representations concurrently. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework achieves root mean square errors (RMSE) of 17.21 mm, 20.18 mm, and 25.14 mm, substantially outperforming the previous state-of-the-art results of 24.37 mm, 27.91 mm, and 33.03 mm on the EEGEyeNet, EEGEyeTrack-Level 1, and EEGEyeTrack-Level 2 datasets, respectively. This remarkable improvement demonstrates the superiority of our dynamic graph-based attention model, combined with contrastive learning, over static or transformer-based approaches for robust EEG regression. The source code is publicly available at: https://github.com/timeseriessignal/GACNet .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.