ArticleBMC public health2026
Appropriate use of Doxy-PEP and inappropriate antibiotic self-medication for STI management: insights from a LGBTQIA+ survey in Italy.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Do Nurses Navigate the Challenges of Risk Management? Results from a Cross-Sectional Survey in Southern Italy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDoxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) has emerged as a promising strategy for preventing selected bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Nevertheless, concerns remain regarding unsupervised access and inappropriate antibiotic use, particularly in populations disproportionately affected by STIs. In Italy, evidence on real-life Doxy-PEP use and antibiotic self-medication for STI management is still limited.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey among LGBTQIA+ individuals in Italy to estimate the prevalence of Doxy-PEP use and antibiotic self-medication involving antibiotics other than doxycycline, and to identify associated determinants. Data were collected through an anonymous, online questionnaire disseminated via community-based channels.
resultsAmong 211 respondents, 21.3% reported Doxy-PEP use, while 11.1% antibiotic self-medication for STI management. Doxy-PEP use was associated with HIV PrEP use (OR = 6.10; 95% CI: 1.09–34.24) and at least one STI diagnosis in the previous 12 months (OR = 6.33; 95% CI: 1.72–23.41), whereas it was inversely associated with antibiotic self-medication (OR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00–0.56). Antibiotic self-medication was associated with a history of prior STIs (OR = 4.82; 95% CI: 1.27–18.37) and younger age (OR = 0.93 for year; 95% CI: 0.86–0.99). A non-negligible proportion of Doxy-PEP users obtained doxycycline through informal or non-prescribed channels.
conclusionsTwo distinct patterns of antibiotic exposure coexist within the Italian LGBTQIA+ community: structured Doxy-PEP use embedded in prevention pathways and unsupervised antibiotic self-medication. Integrated strategies are needed to support appropriate Doxy-PEP implementation, reinforce antimicrobial stewardship, and reduce barriers to equitable sexual health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.