ArticleBMC nutrition2026
Healthcare provider perceptions of a pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExposure to pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription programs (FVPP) is associated with improvements in food security, dietary intake, and clinical markers of health in youth. However, an investigation of experiences with these programs from physicians and staff responsible for implementation is missing. This study was a qualitative investigation of provider and staff experiences with a pediatric FVPP that provided one $15 produce prescription to patients during pediatric visits.
methodsResearchers conducted focus groups across four primary care clinics that offered the pediatric FVPP for at least four years. Focus group recordings were transcribed for textual analysis. Using thematic analysis, researchers examined qualitative data to identify patterns across transcripts and formulate emerging themes. Researchers concluded when data saturation was reached.
resultsEight focus groups across four clinics were conducted with a total of 40 participants (n = 20 healthcare providers, n = 20 staff). The following recurrent themes emerged: (i) reliance on community-based organization; (ii) operationalizing the FVPP; (iii) clinic benefits; (iv) program challenges; and (v) program suggestions.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that providers and staff who implemented the current pediatric FVPP perceived the program to have numerous benefits, including improved no-show rates. Findings inform national efforts to establish standards that guide development, implementation, and expansion of produce prescription programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.