ArticleClinical endoscopy2026
Impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely prescribed for diabetes and obesity. Recent studies suggest they may negatively affect bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy (CLN), leading to inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) and repeat procedures. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this association.
methodsPubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, along with abstracts from Digestive Disease Week 2024 and the American College of Gastroenterology Meeting 2024, were searched. Outcomes included IBP, repeat CLNs, and the mean difference in Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores between GLP-1 RA users and non-users. Adjusted odds ratios (OR), for age, sex, body mass index, and diabetes, were pooled.
resultsTwelve studies including 123,858 patients (57,699 GLP-1 RA users) were analyzed. GLP-1 RA use was associated with higher IBP risk (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.11-2.16); adjusted analyses confirmed this (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.02-2.74). BBPS scores were lower among GLP-1 RA users (mean difference, -0.68; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.58). No association with repeat CLNs was observed (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.88-2.56).
conclusionsGLP-1 RA use is linked to inadequate bowel preparation but not repeat CLNs. Further prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.