ArticleGlobal health action2026
Disability transitions and life expectancy: a national longitudinal study on social isolation and loneliness in China.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional disability among older adults represents a dynamic process characterized by bidirectional transitions between states rather than a static condition. Social isolation and loneliness have emerged as potentially modifiable determinants of functional outcomes, yet evidence specifically examining their effects on disability state transitions remains limited.
objectiveTo examine the independent and interactive associations of social isolation and loneliness with disability state transitions and life expectancy among Chinese adults aged ≥45 years.
methodsWe analyzed data from 20,954 adults aged ≥45 years in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2020). Continuous-time multi-state Markov models examined transitions among four states: no disability, mild disability, severe disability, and death. Life expectancy measures were estimated through numerical integration. Four progressively adjusted models evaluated independent and interactive effects.
resultsSocial isolation significantly increased risks of transitioning from no disability to mild disability (hazard ratio [HR]=1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.33) and from severe disability to death (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.14-1.54), while reducing recovery likelihood from mild disability (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-1.00). Loneliness independently elevated mild disability onset risk (HR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.27) and decreased recovery probability (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97). Their interaction increased mild-to-severe disability deterioration risk (HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13-2.15). At age 45, social isolation reduced total life expectancy by 3.18 years and loneliness by 2.13 years, primarily through compression of disability-free years.
conclusionsSocial isolation and loneliness synergistically influence disability trajectories by affecting both worsening and recovery transitions, with disproportionate impacts on vulnerable subpopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.