Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41944393›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Beyond Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Hype: Practical Solutions and Remaining Hurdles in EV Research, Manufacturing, and Clinical Translation.

David J Lundy, Zoe L Chau, Sheng-You Chen, Nanami Fujisawa, John J Hill, Barnett M Hsu, Joanne K Liu, Karol W Mai, James J Lai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Exosomes in corneal diseases: advances in diagnosis and therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Delivery platforms forFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David J LundyGraduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Zoe L ChauDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Sheng-You ChenWoodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nanami FujisawaGraduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
John J HillDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Barnett M HsuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Joanne K LiuDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Karol W MaiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
James J LaiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 113-2622-E-011-023National Science and Technology Council 114-2314-B-011-001NSTC 113-2314-B-038-109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoscale mediators of intercellular communication with diverse molecular cargoes that reflect their cell of origin. Advances in isolation, detection, and single-particle analytics have revealed increasing molecular and functional heterogeneity, while exposing limitations in how EV identity and activity are currently defined. The field has expanded rapidly; however, translational progress is constrained by an incomplete mechanistic understanding, a lack of standardized measurements, and inconsistencies in regulatory classification. This review provides a critical synthesis of current EV research from an analytical and translational perspective, emphasizing the measurement science needed to define, compare, and benchmark EV preparations as therapeutic products. We discuss evolving regulatory frameworks and recent updates to the MISEV guidelines, highlighting the need for operational definitions grounded in source material, isolation method, and molecular markers. Updated workflow considerations are presented across EV production and characterization, with a focus on orthogonal analyses, quantification of co-isolates, and potency assays that support reproducibility and quality control. Together, these advances and ongoing challenges underscore the need for analytical rigor to transform EV research from descriptive studies into a reproducible and quantitative measurement science.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsCell CommunicationHumansbiomanufacturingextracellular vesicles (EVs)quality attributesregulatory frameworktherapeutic translation

Identifiers

PMID41944393
PMCPMC13159167

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.