ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Candida auris: a multidimensional focus on its identification, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic options.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans have encountered many epidemics caused by pathogenic microorganisms since the turn of the century. The prevalence of fungal infections has significantly increased on a global scale, adversely impacting human health. Candida species remain among the most prevalent and widely spread opportunistic fungi, with Candida auris emerging as a notorious hospital-acquired pathogen. This fungal pathogen causes nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSI), coupled with a high in-hospital death rate and significant multidrug-resistance (MDR). Standard quaternary ammonium compounds (Quats), are often ineffective, requiring the use of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered hospital-grade disinfectants. Routine laboratory procedures often fail to efficiently identify the fungi, making it difficult to predict the infection’s true severity. Hence, molecular-based methods are now considered the gold standard for rapid identification. Despite the availability of approved drugs, their efficacy is questionable due to the emerging drug resistance within the fungal population. The organism appears to acquire drug resistance quickly. While echinocandins remain first-line therapy, the emergence of echinocandin-or pan-resistant cases indicates that treating pan-resistant strains would be particularly tricky, if not unfeasible. This underscores the urgent need for enhanced infection control, improved point-of-care diagnostics, and the development of novel therapeutic strategies. This article highlights the crucial aspects of epidemiology, identification techniques, drug resistance mechanisms, treatments, and challenges associated with C. auris infections. Understanding these interconnected aspects is essential for optimizing clinical management and mitigating the escalating public health crisis posed by this tenacious pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41944852What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.