ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of key performance parameters and development of a youth badminton performance index in male youth players.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Youth badminton performance involves an interplay of structural, physiological, training, and experiential factors more than a stand-alone measure like competition ranking. Yet, in youth programmes, athlete assessment is based on such siloed indicators such as isolated fitness tests or competition results and therefore, fails to appreciate the complexity of performance progression. Consequently, the objective of this study was to ascertain the fundamental multi-focal parameters relevant to youth badminton performance and construct a descriptive performance profiling index in the form of a Youth Badminton Performance Index (YBPI). The study employed a cross-sectional design and the subjects were 170 youth male badminton players aged 9-16 years, drawn from state-level teams and national development programmes. The components of the study were anthropometry, physical fitness, training exposure, competition and injury-related functional activity. To determine the dimensions of performance that lie underneath each of the components, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation was performed. Ten components accounting for 76.43% of the total variance were retained in the analysis. The domains of variance included anthropometric make-up, aerobic-agility, training exposure, competition experience, physical fitness, and injury-related functional readiness. The components were standardised and the YBPI was constructed from the sum of the standardised components, allowing athletes to be positioned within a relative performance grouping based on their multidimensional profile within the sample. These groupings are intended to support descriptive profiling and athlete monitoring rather than talent identification or prediction of future performance. Although the YBPI offers a multi-faceted approach to athlete profiling and monitoring and helps coaches to discern the athlete's characteristics and traits across multiple performance domains, the index is designed for performance profiling at a single point in time and not for forecasting or talent scouting. Practically, the YBPI may assist coaches in identifying whether an athlete's current profile reflects lower, moderate, or higher relative multidimensional performance status within a comparable youth cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.