ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Predictive performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication that can pose numerous adverse health effects on both mothers and newborns. Accurate prediction of the risk of GDM serves as a valuable supplement to prenatal education and clinical decision-making. Compared with traditional prediction models, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have demonstrated higher predictive accuracy and stronger individualization capabilities. However, the application of AI models in GDM prediction is still in a developmental stage, and their performance and clinical utility have not been thoroughly evaluated. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review and critically appraise the published predictive performance of AI models for GDM prediction and to offer insights for future research and practical application.
methodsA systematic literature search will be performed across six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, and OVID). Screening of titles and abstracts, full-text review, and data extraction will be independently completed by two authors. Qualitative data on the characteristics of the included studies, methodological quality, and the applicability of models will be summarized through narrative descriptions and tabulated formats. For models with predictive performance data from multiple studies, a random-effects meta-analysis or meta-regression will be employed to synthesize the findings, considering potential heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is deemed not applicable for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The findings will be based on published literature, disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and presented at major conferences focused on clinical healthcare. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42025645913.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.