ArticleChemSusChem2026
Enzymes for Synthesis and Degradation of Bio-Based Polyesters: Automatic In Silico Screening and Experimental Validation.
Article in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study intends to contribute to the rational eco-design of tailored new sustainable polymers with the aid of computational methods able to generate and screen new biocatalysts in silico for the synthesis or degradation of polyesters. Automatic computational workflows can be used for the rapid selection of enzymes that efficiently catalyze hydrolysis and/or synthesis of bio-based polyesters. Proteins and protein-ligand interactions were studied by integrating specific software for molecular dynamics simulations (Gromacs) and docking (AutoDock) into a workflow which also included some geometric evaluation of productive binding poses. Such a pipeline, based on successive calls to freely available and well-established software tools, was implemented in modeFRONTIER, a package equipped with a graphical user interface in which nodes, representing calls to external programs, are connected to form the sequential workflow. A series of bio-based monomers and enzymes was screened, and the computational results were correlated with experimental data obtained for the synthesis direction as well as with the data available for hydrolysis. The pipeline, by prioritizing and ranking molecules, enables the identification of optimal catalysts for both synthetic and hydrolytic reactions, emphasizing efficient prioritization and ranking strategies. The method was validated on a pool of 6 proteins and 20 substrates, and the predicted enzyme-substrate matches were subsequently compared with both the experimental synthesis and hydrolysis data, thereby confirming the reliability of the predictions. Overall, the results indicate that the hydrolytic and synthetic activity of enzymes toward polyesters can be rationally predicted by integrating different computational tools, providing a cost-effective alternative to time-consuming experimental screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.