ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Development of a dietary management indicator system for older adults with disabilities: a Delphi study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a personal competency evaluation indicator system for tuberculosis health educators: a scoping review and Delphi study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to develop a national consensus on the needs and dietary management of disabled older adults and guide their nutritional care. Methods: A systematic review of the literature in the Pubmed was conducted to identify evidence regarding the nutritional management of disabled older adults people. Subsequently, an expert panel was formed to understand their perspectives on the nutritional management of disabled older adults people through semi-structured interviews. Finally, through a modified Delphi method, a multidisciplinary expert panel was invited to refine and validate the nutritional management indicators for disabled older adults people. Results: The average score of three expert coordination coefficients were 0.95 (judgmental basis), 0.86 (familiarity), 0.90 (authority) respectively. The average score of Kendall's W was 0.890. A comprehensive list for the nutritional management of disabled older adults people was established, which covers 35 primary indicators, 16 sary indicators, and 33 tertiary indicators. Conclusion: The index system of nutritional needs and dietary management for disabled older adult individuals, as constructed in this study, provides a theoretically grounded framework that requires further empirical validation. It provides a reference for the nutritional management of disabled older adults in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.